Difference between revisions of "Utah Mistake"

From Lawpendium
Jump to: navigation, search
Banner Ad photo UtahWillsBannerAdforLawpendiumPhotoshop_zpscc99065d.png
(Created page with "'''Mutual mistake:''' Elements to be proved by clear and convincing evidence: # that at the time the contract was entered into both parties were mistaken about these facts,...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Mutual mistake:'''
+
==Mutual mistake:==
  
 
Elements to be proved by clear and convincing evidence:
 
Elements to be proved by clear and convincing evidence:
Line 17: Line 17:
  
  
'''Unilateral mistake:'''
+
==Unilateral mistake:==
  
 
Elements to be proved by clear and convincing evidence:
 
Elements to be proved by clear and convincing evidence:

Revision as of 18:14, 20 January 2015

Mutual mistake:

Elements to be proved by clear and convincing evidence:

  1. that at the time the contract was entered into both parties were mistaken about these facts, and
  2. that these facts were a basic assumption or an important fact upon which they based their bargain.

References:

England v. Horbach, 944 P.2d 340 (Utah 1997).

Despain v. Despain, 855 P.2d 254 (Utah Ct. App. 1993).

Robert Langston Ltd. v. McQuarrie, 741 P.2d 554 (Utah Ct. App. 1987).

Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 151, 152 (1979).


Unilateral mistake:

Elements to be proved by clear and convincing evidence:

  1. a party was mistaken about a particular matter;
  2. the mistake has such serious consequences that to enforce the contract would be unconscionable;
  3. the matter about which the mistake was made related to a material feature of the contract;
  4. the mistake occurred even though the party made a reasonable effort to understand the circumstances about which he was mistaken; and
  5. the other party can be put back in the same position he was in before the contract, losing only the benefit of the bargain.

References:

Guardian State Bank v. Stangl, 778 P.2d 1, 4-5 (Utah 1989).

Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co., 849 P.2d 1187 (Utah Ct. App. 1993).

Klas v. Van Wagoner, 829 P.2d 135 (Utah Ct. App. 1992).