Difference between revisions of "Utah joint venture"
From Lawpendium
(Created page with "Joint venture: As a general rule, in order for a joint venture to exist there must be: (1) a community of interest in the performance of the common purpose; (2) a joint propri...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Joint venture: As a general rule, in order for a joint venture to exist there must be: | + | Joint venture: As a general rule, in order for a joint venture to exist there must be: |
+ | |||
+ | # a community of interest in the performance of the common purpose; | ||
+ | # a joint proprietary interest in the subject matter; | ||
+ | # a mutual right to control; | ||
+ | # a right to share in the profits; and | ||
+ | # unless there is an agreement to the contrary, a duty to share in any losses which may be sustained. | ||
[http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=Ellsworth+Paulsen+Const.+Co.+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,45&case=502772107124324942&scilh=0 Ellsworth Paulsen Const. Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C., 2008 UT 28, 183 P.3d 248] | [http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=Ellsworth+Paulsen+Const.+Co.+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,45&case=502772107124324942&scilh=0 Ellsworth Paulsen Const. Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C., 2008 UT 28, 183 P.3d 248] |
Latest revision as of 03:59, 20 January 2015
Joint venture: As a general rule, in order for a joint venture to exist there must be:
- a community of interest in the performance of the common purpose;
- a joint proprietary interest in the subject matter;
- a mutual right to control;
- a right to share in the profits; and
- unless there is an agreement to the contrary, a duty to share in any losses which may be sustained.
Ellsworth Paulsen Const. Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C., 2008 UT 28, 183 P.3d 248