Difference between revisions of "Utah Tortious interference with prospective economic relations"

Latest revision as of 18:30, 22 January 2015

The elements of the tort of interference with potential economic relations are:

Defendant intentionally interfered with potential economic relations
for an improper purpose (predominant purpose was to injure the plaintiff—can be outweighed by legitimate long-range interest in further one’s own economic condition) or by improper means (violence, threats or other intimidation, deceit or misrepresentation, disparaging falsehood)
causing injury to plaintiff

SEE ALSO this page Utah Tortious interference with economic relations

Revision as of 18:29, 22 January 2015 (view source) Admin (Talk \| contribs) (Created page with "The elements of the tort of interference with potential economic relations are: # Defendant intentionally interfered with potential economic relations # for an improper purpo...")		Latest revision as of 18:30, 22 January 2015 (view source) Admin (Talk \| contribs)
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=811+P.2d+194&hl=en&as_sdt=6,45&case=4072437642060005993&scilh=0 St. Benedict's Dev. v. St. Benedict's Hosp., 811 P. 2d 194 (Utah 1991)]		[http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=811+P.2d+194&hl=en&as_sdt=6,45&case=4072437642060005993&scilh=0 St. Benedict's Dev. v. St. Benedict's Hosp., 811 P. 2d 194 (Utah 1991)]
		+
		+	'''SEE ALSO''' this page [[Utah Tortious interference with economic relations]]